Re: [ox-en] Qt being proprietary
- From: Gunter van Aken <gunter 303.nu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:11:46 +0100
Niall Douglas wrote:
There's more free software for Windows by volume than Linux and so
it's the more important market to have a non-commercial version of
Qt. I don't know, it just seems wrong to have double standards like
that - we need free software more for Windows.
What do you mean with "by volume"?
I like the fact that users of proprietary systems - who
apparently care less about their freedom - are paying to
support a product that is available as free software.
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: projekt oekonux.de