I guess some of you have seen this:
http://www.bangkokpost.com/090507_Database/09May2007_data05.php
where Microsoft's platform director argues Linux 'as free software',
already no longer exists
I have a question as to the exact way the community and the corporation
cooperate
- open source remains mostly nonproprietary software, but is
increasinly produced by paid employes, true or not true?
- which side dominates: the corporate or the community?
- if the community is still a core element of open source, what is
their relation to the paid employees
- how are these paid employees working: as free as community
programmers, or are they under a command and control hierarchy; wny does
the crowding out factor not apply (i.e. paid employees discouraging
further work by volunteers, as it often happens, why not here?)
- who decides on the main strategic directions of free software
development?
- if the paid employees are free in their work, does their salary then
not function as a kind of basic income, not related to their exact
'work'??
I think these questions are pretty crucial in determining the future
course of free software.
The P2P Foundation researches, documents and promotes peer to peer
alternatives.
Wiki and Encyclopedia, at http://p2pfoundation.net; Blog, at
http://blog.p2pfoundation.net; Newsletter, at
http://integralvisioning.org/index.php?topic=p2p
Basic essay at http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499; interview at
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2006/09/p2p-very-core-of-world-to-come.html;
video interview, at
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/09/29/network_collaboration_peer_to_peer.htm
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de