Message 05505 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT05464 Message: 70/92 L9 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] Apple trees (aka capitalism) are bad. What about barter exchange?



[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi Diego,

I think it is possible to have very decent lifestyles, with much lower
levels of material and energy consumption

for example, I remember reading that you can drive just as much, but when
you use carsharing, you reduce the cost by 80%

this happens by just changing the property option on the car ...

there are many many ways to have a rich cultural life, covering material and
cultural needs, that do not require a return to 'caveman' existence (who by
the way, may have had a better life than us ... see the anthropological work
on original affluence by marshall sahlin and others)

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Diego Saravia <diego.saravia gmail.com>wrote:

2009/4/26 Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 gmail.com>:
[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Diego,

I have no issue with consumption levels being hard to sustain, but the
US,
without this welfare system, consumes much more energy than Europe,

yes 2 times more per people, I think

so
'blaming' the welfare system for it seems disingenous;

without "popular" consumption you can reduce it more

also, capital did not
need to unions and workers agreement to exploit the rest of the world,

mmm, political movements  and unions in Europe were very strong at that
times.

Comunist parties and others plus a very strong URSS could change
western Europe. Cold war, Cultural war, operations as Gladio, and
other strategies were not a game.

they
did that way before welfare

for capitalist is better to have a uniformly  exploited world, but
they are limited by politics, where politics is strong enough



so I see that differently, workers and unions were strong enough, and
capital weak enough, and scared of the Soviets, to arrive at a compromise
for european workers ...

yes, its the same I said.


we need a global welfare system,

yes

not based on high levels of consumption

yes, but seems something contradictory. Global welfare and low
consumption could means reducing population or going back to cave
ages.

but
on covering essential needs, for the whole world, and blaming european
workers for that is not going to advance that agenda I think

blaming?

I am not blaming, they did what was good for them

Stronger civilizations always conquer weaker ones

I do not think history as a list of actions to blame the people who
did each one.

each one of us is a survivor who eated a lot of "loosers"

this reasoning also leaves the local elites blameless, which is why I
guess
it's a popular meme,

local elites in third word usually are descendant of conquerers

you  will get a better picture if you analize genetics

for example in LA most people have native origins in mother line and
european in father one

in England 3/4 of population is descendant of one of the oldest kings.



--
Diego Saravia
Diego.Saravia gmail.com
NO FUNCIONA->dsa unsa.edu.ar
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de




-- 
Working at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University -
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html -
http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI

Volunteering at the P2P Foundation:
http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net -
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com

Monitor updates at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens

The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
http://www.shiftn.com/


[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de



Thread: oxenT05464 Message: 70/92 L9 [In index]
Message 05505 [Homepage] [Navigation]